[Hawk]

No there wasn't. Patron licenses started the same year as crossbows. And by the way even if there were patron permits there weren't legalized crossbows. Your an idiot .

This article is from July 2013 and says the WIDNR has asked hubters to but patron licenses "The theory is that people buy their licenses all at one time and they become "patrons" of natural resources in the state. It has been something that the DNR has promoted for many years"....

Stop lying.

Should Wisconsin DNR's top administrators buy conservation patron license? - Outdoornews
http://www.outdoornews.com/2013/07/...07/09/should-wisconsin-dnrs-top-administrators-buy-conservation-patron-license/

 

[henry]

No, they didnt. Prove your statement

I did , even if patron license was available xbows weren't legal . Show us something from Wisconsin that says they don't have 260k+ archery hunters. You are knowingly lying about Missouri archery hunter numbers and accusing someone else of lying. Wapos. Lol

 

[Hawk]

I did , even if patron license was available xbows weren't legal . Show us something from Wisconsin that says they don't have 260k+ archery hunters. You are knowingly lying about Missouri archery hunter numbers and accusing someone else of lying. Wapos. Lol

Again, the comparable number from MDC, measuring the same thing, is 205k+.

Calling me a pos because you got proven wrong and caught in a lie is one reason why I fix your nonsense. It makes me laugh.....[emoji23] [emoji23] [emoji23] [emoji23]

 

[henry]

Again, the comparable number from MDC, measuring the same thing, is 205k+.

No. That's a lie you are perpetuating knowing that permit sales and hunter numbers are different in Missouri while in Wisconsin they are very similar. Wawpos. Lol

 

[Hawk]

No. That's a lie you are perpetuating knowing that permit sales and hunter numbers are different in Missouri while in Wisconsin they are very similar. Wawpos. Lol

Again, thats a lie. WI doesnt quantify actual archery hunter numbers. If they did they would likely have similar results to MO

 

[henry]

Again, thats a lie. WI doesnt quantify actual archery hunter numbers. If they did they would likely have similar results to MO

Actually they do quantify it. And no they have a lot more archery hunters and always have. All you have to do is ask them like we already have. And then stop omitting the snippet following the one you have been using from the Missouri report showing they adjusted the archery license sales down by 134500. Lol

 

[Hawk]

Actually they do quantify it. And no they have a lot more archery hunters and always have. All you have to do is ask them like we already have. And then stop omitting the snippet following the one you have been using from the Missouri report showing they adjusted the archery license sales down by 134500. Lol

Then show the quantification.

Again, this is an apples to apples comparison. This is why you are wrong most og the time when you try to compare states tags, hunter numbers, harvests and success rates.

 

[henry]

Then show the quantification.

Again, this is an apples to apples comparison. This is why you are wrong most og the time when you try to compare states tags, hunter numbers, harvests and success rates.

No. It's not apples to apples. You are making a claim you know is wrong for Missouri. The very next slide in the presentation you have quoted shows so . Lol. . That is clearly labeled "permits" . Wisconsin released their information clearly labeled licensed hunters not hunting license. Why don't you give us this info from Wisconsin that says that's not accurate . Lol. You have the info from Missouri that tells you what you are using isn't. Lol

 

[Hawk]

No. It's not apples to apples. You are making a claim you know is wrong for Missouri. The very next slide in the presentation you have quoted shows so . Lol. . That is clearly labeled "permits" . Wisconsin released their information clearly labeled licensed hunters not hunting license. Why don't you give us this info from Wisconsin that says that's not accurate . Lol. You have the info from Missouri that tells you what you are using isn't. Lol

Whats the difference? They are both the same thing. Permits is the amount of unique hunters with that specific permit. Licensed hunters is the amount of unique hubters woth that license. Its the same thing.

If you want to talk about the ACTUAL PERMITTEES OR LICENSED HUNTERS that huntedthen thats different. But realize thats NOT what you are claiming that WI document is showing. That is just all the people that purchased or were issued a license to stab a deer with a pointy stick

 

[henry]

No. It's not the same thing and im comfortable that everyone realizes that. Missouri has the ability for people to get both landownet and regular permits for the same season and Wisconsin doesn't. Come up with something less lame Hak. Lol

 

[Hawk]

No. It's not the same thing and im comfortable that everyone realizes that. Missouri has the ability for people to get both landownet and regular permits for the same season and Wisconsin doesn't. Come up with something less lame Hak. Lol

Are you sure about that?

This is the mo unique Hunter number for 2016 it went up considerably in 2017

 

[henry]

Yes. Plenty sure.

 

[Hawk]

Yes. Plenty sure.

Well, youre wrong. That number you posted was the total number of vertical, vertical upgrades, crossbow, crossbow upgrades, and patron permits issued. It is NOT the number of actual bowhunters.

 

[henry]

Well, youre wrong. That number you posted was the total number of vertical, vertical upgrades, crossbow, crossbow upgrades, and patron permits issued. It is NOT the number of actual bowhunters.

Your really sad. The number I posted was from before there were crossbows allowed. Lol. Their number should be higher now

 

[Hawk]

Your really sad. The number I posted was from before there were crossbows allowed. Lol. Their number should be higher now View attachment 98710

And you are saying this is the actual hunters number and not permits issued number?