Don't need an explanation just saying not all of, maybe a few will reach 150s at 51/2. I have seen that over last 15yrs on my Ozark property. I also have seen plenty of 3 1/2-4 1/2 yr olds up north reach that without trouble. I owned property in Putnam County right on Iowa border for 30 yrs so I know 100% there is a difference. Not only in body size but size of racks.Have someone explain the chart I posted to you. What you are describing is caused by high grading.
Some folks use a lot of wiggle room with their inferences when they have a gullible audience wanting to believe every buck will get really big.I do what some might say is rigorous, peer-reviewed, science. I work with a lot of folks that do the same. What I can say with 100% certainty is that folks can promote themselves, their work, and their data to the highest of levels while everyone else just sits back and says "yeah, nothing fantastic about that". I'm pretty skeptical of most anyone. Except of myself of course.![]()
And where is this science data located .?All the available data collected by rigorous science says otherwise.
well saidPotential, but reality and real life deer I have followed, sheds I have found and measured prove to me that not every deer that makes it to 5.5 will score 150+! I’ll give you that most 5.5 yo bucks will get close to and surpass 150 but not ALL
Not sure what the other one is, but Show Me Big Bucks Club no longer makes a distinction between south and north Missouri for entries. For typicals, it used to be minimum 150 north, and 140 south. Can’t remember NT minimums. It’s now minimum 140 T and 155 NT statewide.Even Mo big buks club and the other one has different criteria for the different geography
Your participating in a post with an individual that does just that… 😂I do what some might say is rigorous, peer-reviewed, science. I work with a lot of folks that do the same. What I can say with 100% certainty is that folks can promote themselves, their work, and their data to the highest of levels while everyone else just sits back and says "yeah, nothing fantastic about that". I'm pretty skeptical of most anyone. Except of myself of course.![]()
Dud, that's the kind of story I would love you to tell while were all sitting around drinking a beer. Hilarious.Had a guy hunting on a neighbor. He said he would not shoot a buck unless it was 170 or better. I asked him if he understood where he was hunting. Told him he would be waiting a long time in the MO Ozarks for a 170 buck. Guy was full of BS and ended up taking what he called a 150. In reality it would be a stretch to hit 130s. Nothing wrong with a buck that size, but the guy had an unrealistic idea of what our area will produce.
Is the rigorous science in the thread with us?All the available data collected by rigorous science says otherwise.
It’s always with us… all around us… in the ether, finely appointed with stardust and pixies.Is the rigorous science in the thread with us?
You forgot stripper glitter., finely appointed with stardust and pixies.
I didn’t want to cheapen it.You forgot stripper glitter.
Stripper glitter doesnt come cheap. Or so Ive heard.I didn’t want to cheapen it.
Only when it comes to cigars, bourbon and golf courses bro. 😎Im not sure someone that is an elitist should throw that term around.
And older deer👀I do agree with one of your statements that if you let 100 deer live from 0.5 to 5.5 years of age, that you will have move 150" deer on the landscape.
I do not believe that the average deer in MO will ever reach an average score of 150" north to south, east to west, across the entire state even if you allow them to live to infinity. But, you will have, on average, bigger deer.
Did I misread what you said and said the data stated??? Did you say every bucknin MO allowed to reach 5.5 would grow/score a 150” or moreAll the available data collected by rigorous science says otherwise.
Yep he only hunted there one season. Think he got embarrassed. The buck he shot was nice for the Ozarks, just not a 150Dud, that's the kind of story I would love you to tell while were all sitting around drinking a beer. Hilarious.
Probably only hunts Iowa now for twohundy.Yep he only hunted there one season. Think he got embarrassed. The buck he shot was nice for the Ozarks, just not a 150