Missouri Whitetails - Your Missouri Hunting Resource banner

real life reduced recoil load experiences?

2524 Views 37 Replies 17 Participants Last post by  GTOHunter
like the title said.. thinking in a youth 30-30 Marlin
1 - 20 of 38 Posts
I can see practice with low recoil bullets but for that first shot a full load should be used in my opinion.
I can see practice with low recoil bullets but for that first shot a full load should be used in my opinion.
I tend to agree with this. I did put a sims recoil pad on my lever gun, but my 2 small framed grandsons around this same age had no problems with the recoil
thanks for answering the question gents
My nephew's son is a small little guy, and he has some issues with the 7mm/08 his father bought him. I'll be watching this thread, because the little guy still needs something that kicks less than that 7mm.
If I can make it out there, I'll let him use my AR with the adjustable stock, the 60gr. Hornadys won't kick much, and it shoots well.
thanks for answering the question gents[/QUOTE
Sorry sir; no intent to derail thread, I have no personal experience with the reduced recoil loads.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
just teasn .. MWT is known for its thread swerves and "opinions" ..no harm done... goes for you too MM
Have used the Remington 7-08, no problems or complaints
  • Like
Reactions: 2
If the bullet is put where it should be, a 30-30 loaded to 1600-1800 fps WITH either a good cast bullet or a jacketed bullet appropriate to that velocity, within its range limits, (about 200 yards), it will kill as effectively as a full house, 3000 fps load from say a 270 or like intensity cartridge. I've proven it so many times with more than a dozen cartridges as to be boringly redundant. Others can argue that fact all they want but, all the argument in the world doesn't change the truth of the statement.
  • Like
Reactions: 5
If the bullet is put where it should be, a 30-30 loaded to 1600-1800 fps WITH either a good cast bullet or a jacketed bullet appropriate to that velocity, within its range limits, (about 200 yards), it will kill as effectively as a full house, 3000 fps load from say a 270 or like intensity cartridge. I've proven it so many times with more than a dozen cartridges as to be boringly redundant. Others can argue that fact all they want but, all the argument in the world doesn't change the truth of the statement.
100% truth. We've had very good success with youths and reduced recoil loads killing plenty of deer.
  • Like
Reactions: 4
It's not usually the load that is used, so much as the rifle it's being fired from... When it comes to recoil. (Not talkin bout Magnums here)

For instance, I bought my wife a T/C Venture in .243, and another one in 7mm-08 for a friend who is a smaller guy. There is very litte recoil with either of them, they are fairly "sturdy" built rifles.

30/30 leverguns, are normally small and light, so yes you feel them more than a heavier gun. Given most Whitetail hunting in MO is done from a tree stand, a slightly heavier firearm is rarely much of an issue, and can go a long way in minimizing recoil IMHO.

That T/C Venture in .243 is a deer hammer too.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
BTW, the Marlin 336 is a bit heavier than a Win94, and in my experience recoil is less of an issue. He'd have no problem killing a whitetail with one of those with reduced recoil loads, but even regular 150gr loads probably not too bad.... I have a 336 with scope, etc and it's not bad to shoot at all.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
BTW, the Marlin 336 is a bit heavier than a Win94, and in my experience recoil is less of an issue. He'd have no problem killing a whitetail with one of those with reduced recoil loads, but even regular 150gr loads probably not too bad.... I have a 336 with scope, etc and it's not bad to shoot at all.
its Granddaughter (s) 10 &12 but point taken
I recently bought one of those little model 94s and havent shot it yet, but I expect some recoil. I forgot how small that leveraction gun really is.
its Granddaughter (s) 10 &12 but point taken
I'm a sexist pig.... :wave1: :D
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I'll second cj on the 243. My wife has been using one for 35 years and the destruction I've seen with that little 100 gr. bullet at about 2600-2700 fps still astounds me every time I dress one of her deer. Her rifle is an older Savage bolt rifle and I think it's a bit heavy for the cartridge, consequently recoil is held to a fairly low level. My wife isn't a "shooter" either. We check her rifle before the season and, if she gets a shot, she shoots the deer and doesn't handle the rifle again until the next year.
I'll second cj on the 243. My wife has been using one for 35 years and the destruction I've seen with that little 100 gr. bullet at about 2600-2700 fps still astounds me every time I dress one of her deer. Her rifle is an older Savage bolt rifle and I think it's a bit heavy for the cartridge, consequently recoil is held to a fairly low level. My wife isn't a "shooter" either. We check her rifle before the season and, if she gets a shot, she shoots the deer and doesn't handle the rifle again until the next year.
100gr Sierra Pro Hunters are lethal from a .243. My wife is a pretty good shot, and can shoot a 2" group at 100 yards with it off a rest..... Last year, she dropped a majestic at 100yds in it's tracks.... :D
thats great sharps but we dont have 243 .
That being said I have seen a monster OMG Buck taken with a 243
  • Like
Reactions: 1
thats great sharps but we dont have 243 .
That being said I have seen a monster OMG Buck taken with a 243
Using reduced recoil loads in that 336 will work out just fine, unless she's wanting to bust one down at 400 yds. :D
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Using reduced recoil loads in that 336 will work out just fine, unless she's wanting to bust one down at 400 yds. :D
i think we'll keep it to 100 or less :D
1 - 20 of 38 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top