Missouri Whitetails - Your Missouri Hunting Resource banner
21 - 40 of 216 Posts

· Banned
Joined
·
66,381 Posts
Discussion Starter · #24 ·
Thats not an answer. Why not add archery? What is the down side?
 

· Banned
Joined
·
66,381 Posts
Discussion Starter · #25 ·

· Banned
Joined
·
66,381 Posts
Discussion Starter · #26 ·
wouldn't want to compare the opening day numbers to what they once were
No, I wouldnt because those were not sustainable or realistic. You probably expect your wife to make the best dinner she ever cooked every night....
 

· Banned
Joined
·
66,381 Posts
Discussion Starter · #27 ·
because you don't liberalize when things are bad, like population numbers! what you suggest is very liberal minded!
You can when regs dont matter. Its not liberal minded, its science based.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
66,381 Posts
Discussion Starter · #30 ·
well then, all that book smart and not the sense God gave a dairy cow!
No, they just know more than 20 does. Why? Because they have went to an area, removed half the raccoons. Took another area and removed none of the raccoons. Then compared the results over a period of years and found that 20 is wrong.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
29,369 Posts
No, they just know more than 20 does. Why? Because they have went to an area, removed half the raccoons. Took another area and removed none of the raccoons. Then compared the results over a period of years and found that 20 is wrong.
well, to accurate they should invent a time machine and go back when the raccoon numbers were in check (good ufr prices) and then compare it to the last 10 years....but since time travel isn't possible (although maybe the biologist know morer about time travel) perhaps they could utilize better reasoning and deductions skills....or, since the fur market isn't likely coming back anytime soon, they can pretend there is no correlation between predator and far reduced turkey populations and kill numbers.....therefore back to the weather excuse:)
 

· Banned
Joined
·
66,381 Posts
Discussion Starter · #32 ·

· Banned
Joined
·
66,381 Posts
Discussion Starter · #33 ·
well, to accurate they should invent a time machine and go back when the raccoon numbers were in check (good ufr prices) and then compare it to the last 10 years....but since time travel isn't possible (although maybe the biologist know morer about time travel) perhaps they could utilize better reasoning and deductions skills....or, since the fur market isn't likely coming back anytime soon, they can pretend there is no correlation between predator and far reduced turkey populations and kill numbers.....therefore back to the weather excuse:)
That wouldnt be possible because nest predator numbers were never in check.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
66,381 Posts
Discussion Starter · #34 ·
Just wondering 20, what would you consider an "average" turkey kill per year for MO? What would satisfy you?
 

· Banned
Joined
·
66,381 Posts
Discussion Starter · #36 ·
Awesome. This thread turned out exactly as I thought (was designed to by OP).
Im not the one that took it off track...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,308 Posts
Hawk - Why do you keep saying that something that was sustained for 15 years or so (PHR of 3:1 +/-) and the resulting population number isn't sustainable? It most certainly was/is.

We are nowhere near the carrying capacity of the land. Obviously somewhere that used to be 1000 acres of hardwoods that is now fescue wasteland won't have any birds. But 1000s of acres are unchanged and the bird numbers are so far below what the habitat could hold it is ridiculous.

Fur bearers were in check in the late 80s and early 90s which directly led to more turkey numbers.

Weather has always been fickle and I agree it does have a huge impact on the turkey numbers. However, anyway you look at, the predators compound the weather issue or the weather issues compound the predator issue. I remember having a few BRUTAL springs in the late 1980s but the hatch was great. Why, because the nest predators weren't out of control like they are now. As recently as 3-5 years ago we had some perfect spring weather during the nesting period and the hatch still sucked (No, I'm not nor ever will call a PHR of 1.1:1 a good hatch). Why, because there are too many damn predators plain and simple.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
66,381 Posts
Discussion Starter · #40 ·
Hawk - Why do you keep saying that something that was sustained for 15 years or so (PHR of 3:1 +/-) and the resulting population number isn't sustainable? It most certainly was/is.

We are nowhere near the carrying capacity of the land. Obviously somewhere that used to be 1000 acres of hardwoods that is now fescue wasteland won't have any birds. But 1000s of acres are unchanged and the bird numbers are so far below what the habitat could hold it is ridiculous.

Fur bearers were in check in the late 80s and early 90s which directly led to more turkey numbers.

Weather has always been fickle and I agree it does have a huge impact on the turkey numbers. However, anyway you look at, the predators compound the weather issue or the weather issues compound the predator issue. I remember having a few BRUTAL springs in the late 1980s but the hatch was great. Why, because the nest predators weren't out of control like they are now. As recently as 3-5 years ago we had some perfect spring weather during the nesting period and the hatch still sucked (No, I'm not nor ever will call a PHR of 1.1:1 a good hatch). Why, because there are too many damn predators plain and simple.
It wasnt sustainable. No one ever expected it to stay that high. As populations expand they become less productive.

We were never at or above 3.1 for 15 years. At most 6 and that was at the very PEAK of statewide restoration efforts and the flock was no where near reestablished. In fact some counties hadnt even had a turkey released at that point.

Theres NO SUCH THING AS UNCHANGED HABITAT, unless it was managed to be unchanged. Those 1000s of acres of timber have changed.... no way around it.

Plant Rectangle Slope Plot Font
 
21 - 40 of 216 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top