[rquote=2793064&tid=100960&author=Parker][rquote=2793040&tid=100960&author=cshoff]Just remember that, for DEFENSIVE handgun shooting, you ALWAYS want to rely on you dominant eye AND your dominant hand rather than trying to "teach" your body to do something that is totally non-instinctive such as using your non-dominant eye or non-dominant hand for primary operations. [/rquote]
For immediate defense, I agree, but for shooting from a barricade, you horribly expose your body if you are leaning out from your non-dominant side. :shrug:
I see this as a reason to learn to shoot with each eye, and with each hand. Do you agree?
Parker[/rquote]
Being able to shoot with either hand can be important, but to your point regarding leaning from cover/concealment on your support-hand side, I don't agree. If you are using your cover/concealment properly, and "slicing your pie" as you should be, any additional exposure you might show from your "weak" side is minimal at best. It is always a much less efficient process to rely on your "weak" attributes to perform a task that requires as much strength and dexterity as you can muster. Not to mention the gross misuse of training resources you would have to expend to actually develop a weak-side response that would ever be close to the equivalent of the response you can already deploy using your dominant attributes during the stress of an actual lethal force encounter.
As to "learning to shoot with either eye", the truth is, once we understand the concepts of sight alignment and sight picture, not to mention the concepts of combat accuracy and kinesthetic alignment, we don't have to spend much time or energy "training" our "weak" eye to be able to properly sight a firearm. In the event that your dominant eye becomes injured, it is very natural and very instinctive for the human mind to shift dominant duties to what was before, the non-dominant eye.
Sorry to derail the thread. We can start a new one and have the mods delete the off-topic stuff here if you'd like. Won't hurt my feelings.